CO129-295 - Public Offices - 1899 — Page 10

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Maper to form all-British Cab. between sing a for

IH. Rony via Labuan agreement attached to 25770/98. ? Inform all. Balfour's private secretary to the above effect, and that we have no objection to the publication of the two first mention a series of ron 7 and

the last mentioned

(The correspondence leading up to this last agreement was partly confidential)

for E. Wingfield

145/7/8

There has been a mass of correspondence I should ask the C.O. to say so

to

the Agreement

is referred to in a

and

give to Parliament the latest, 1893: laying

"that

: saying that

former

dence

If for little found the correspondence

many years dispart glit

& Joer

g

a confidential nature, but if the Hon: member wishes to press his motion he will consult the Colonial Office to meeting his wishes

CPL.

a1

attached) whether question, especially

.8

will answer

the

you

the Chancellor is

assay.

I have spoken to Sir Edward Wingfield who

thinks that a

reply

in the

form of a minute will

meet the case

? Reps.

1893.

The latest agreement, that of

Inderand be laid before Parliament.

the earlier correspondence

}

but

is not only of a confidential nature, but is also very

voluminous and extend over

Many

I fear therefore it could not be printed If the Right Honourable Member wishes

to

request I shall

meet his wishes

Ir.Suiller and informed accordingly

27/8

Z. Chamberlain

B. Iuillem and now asks (see further

35-2000-1-99 195-2000-4-99

M. Lucas I presume the agreement of

1893 should now be laid before

Parl 7. Aug 10/8 for E. Wingfield and

Vingfield

Shall we send a printed copy to Mr Lucas if he wishes it laid!? CFF 10/8

Edit History

2026-05-31 11:20:54 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Maper to form all-British Cab. between sing a for IH. Rony via Labuan agreement attached to 25770/98. ? Inform all. Balfour's private secretary to the above effect, and that we have no objection to the publication of the two first mention a series of ron 7 and the last mentioned (The correspondence leading up to this last agreement was partly confidential) for E. Wingfield 145/7/8 There has been a mass of correspondence I should ask the C.O. to say so to the Agreement is referred to in a and give to Parliament the latest, 1893: laying "that : saying that former dence If for little found the correspondence many years dispart glit & Joer g a confidential nature, but if the Hon: member wishes to press his motion he will consult the Colonial Office to meeting his wishes CPL. a1 attached) whether question, especially .8 will answer the you the Chancellor is assay. I have spoken to Sir Edward Wingfield who thinks that a reply in the form of a minute will meet the case ? Reps. 1893. The latest agreement, that of Inderand be laid before Parliament. the earlier correspondence } but is not only of a confidential nature, but is also very voluminous and extend over Many I fear therefore it could not be printed If the Right Honourable Member wishes to request I shall meet his wishes Ir.Suiller and informed accordingly 27/8 Z. Chamberlain B. Iuillem and now asks (see further 35-2000-1-99 195-2000-4-99 M. Lucas I presume the agreement of 1893 should now be laid before Parl 7. Aug 10/8 for E. Wingfield and Vingfield Shall we send a printed copy to Mr Lucas if he wishes it laid!? CFF 10/8
Baseline (Original)
are embochid nithe Maper to form all-Burlish Cabb. between sing a for IH. Rony via Labuan agreement attached to 25770/98. ? Inform all. Balfon's private xentary to the above effect, and that we have no objection to the publication of the tur first mention a series of ron 7 and the last mentioned (The concy leading up to this last agreement wasfarts confidential) for E. Wingfield 145/7/8 There has been a mass of correspondrect I should ask the C. 19. b say so to h дзе Agreement is refoluminau and give to Parliament the latest, 9.93: laying "that : saying that former dence If for little found the correspon. many years dispart glit & Joer g a confidential nature, but-if the "Hon: member wishes to press his motion he will is consult the Colonial Office to meeting his wisher CPL. a1 attached) whether question, especially .8 will answer the you the Chancellor is assay. I have spoken & Sir Edward Wingfield who thinks that a reply in the of M. Luca! minute will meet the came ? Reps. 1893. can The latest agreement, that of Inderand be laid before Parliament. the earlier correspondence } but is not only impart of a confidential nature, but is also very voluminous and extend over Many I fear therefore they is could not be prund If thee Right Month Member wisher I punti ider how for it impossible request I shall A meet hir waken Ir.Suiller and infamed accordingly 27/8 ари Z. Chambulonin B. Iuillem and now asks (su further 35-2000-1-99 195-2000-4-99 then noth العليا M. Lucas I presume the agrement of 1893 should now be laid before Parl 7. Aus 10/8 for 2 Vimpeld and Vingfield Shall we send scrc bilke a share printed copy a ark if he wisher it laid !? CFF 10 から
2026-05-31 11:20:54 · Baseline
View content

are embochid nithe

Maper to form all-Burlish Cabb. between sing a for

IH. Rony via Labuan agreement attached to 25770/98. ? Inform all. Balfon's private xentary to the above effect, and that we have no objection to the publication of the tur first mention a series of ron 7 and

the last mentioned

(The concy leading up to this last agreement wasfarts confidential)

for E. Wingfield

145/7/8

There has been a mass of correspondrect I should ask the C. 19. b say so

to

h

дзе Agreement

is refoluminau

and

give to Parliament the latest, 9.93: laying

"that

: saying that

former

dence

If for little found the correspon.

many years dispart glit

& Joer

g

a confidential nature, but-if the "Hon: member wishes to press his motion he will is consult the Colonial Office to meeting his wisher

CPL.

a1

attached) whether question, especially

.8

will answer

the

you

the Chancellor is

assay.

I have spoken & Sir Edward Wingfield who

thinks that a

reply

in the

of M. Luca!

minute will

meet the came

? Reps.

1893.

can

The latest agreement, that of

Inderand be laid before Parliament.

the earlier correspondence

}

but

is not only impart

of a confidential nature, but is also very

voluminous and extend over

Many

I fear therefore they is could not be prund If thee Right Month Member wisher I punti

ider how for it impossible

request I shall

A meet hir waken

Ir.Suiller and infamed accordingly

27/8

ари

Z. Chambulonin

B. Iuillem and now asks (su further

35-2000-1-99 195-2000-4-99

then noth

العليا

M. Lucas I presume the agrement of

1893 should now be laid before

Parl 7. Aus 10/8 for 2 Vimpeld and

Vingfield

Shall we send scrc bilke a share printed

copy a ark if he wisher it laid !? CFF 10

から

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.